Can someone get fired from refusing a training lgbtq video
Leadership and Staff Training
Leadership and Staff Training
Take part in a comprehensive training program to equip your management and staff with the knowledge to provide exceptional services to modern Queer older adults. SAGECare development is available in the United States, Canada and the UK.
Schedule a Free Discovery Chat
Objectives
SAGECare’s structured credentialed training programs are facilitated virtually or in person by empathetic instructors who engage with teams using accessible content, live webinars, recorded videos, and interactive discussions. Our training services are structured around actual human stories to design relatable experiences that teach employees of all levels.
Trainings provide an overview of the needs, concerns, and unique history of Diverse older adults, as adequately as meaningful steps that teams can take to immediately improve the quality of services they provide. For credentialing purposes, staff are required to finalize one hour of coaching annually through the Creating Inclusive Communities and Supporting LGBTQ+ Older Adults courses. Executives, administrators, and other leadership must complete additional tr
Did the Supreme Court Speak Businesses Can Now Discriminate Against LGBT Customers—and Employees Too?
The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that businesses can now legally reject service to LGBT people in specific circumstances. Its decision in 303 Resourceful v. Elenis allowed a graphic designer to rely on her First Amendment right to free speech to refuse to produce wedding websites for queer couples. This opinion single-handedly upended non-discrimination laws in the marketplace, but its effect is even more far-reaching: as early as the same day as the ruling, it was used to argue for the right to terminate LGBT employees.
LGBT People Acquire Been Under Attack
It was only 20 years ago that consensual gay sex was decriminalized in the United States. Since then, marriage was opened to same-sex couples (2015), and non-discrimination protections in employment were applied to many LGBT people across the country (2020).
Oh, how things have changed. More than 400 anti-LGBT bills own been proposed in articulate legislatures in just the past year. Hearkening help to the most virulent homophobia of the 70s, LGBT people are now casually being referred to as “child groom Serious Legal Problems faced by Lesbian, Same-sex attracted, Bisexual, and Other Sexual-Minority People in Western Canada: A Qualitative Study
Findings
Seventy people completed the online eligibility screener, and 24 completed an interview. Based on content shared within the interview, three participants were deemed ineligible and their data were not included in the analysis. The findings below are based on the remaining 21 interviews. The average age of participants was 34. Participants reported a range of sexual orientations: five identified as lesbian, nine as gay, two as bisexual, seven as queer, one as Two-Spirit, two as pansexual, and one as asexual (participants could elect more than one response option). Five participants identified as women, eight as men, seven as non-binary, and one as “FTM” (i.e., female-to-male, provided as a write-in response). Participants included cisgender, transgender, and genderfluid people who identified as lesbian, queer, or bisexual, or as another non-heterosexual identity (e.g., Two-Spirit, queer). Seven participants reported having lived experience as transgender, a history of gender transition, and/or identified as gender diverse. The majority of par
Nondiscrimination Laws
Housing nondiscrimination laws protect LGBTQ people from being unfairly evicted, denied housing, or refused the ability to rent or buy housing on the basis of their sexual orientation or gender identity. This map shows state housing nondiscrimination laws that explicitly enumerate sexual orientation and/or gender self as protected classes, as well as states that explicitly interpret existing sex protections to include sexual orientation and/or gender individuality. Additionally, in states without state protections, municipalities may provide local-level nondiscrimination protections. See our maps watching local-level nondiscrimination ordinances here.
Other rights may exist or be recognized where you live; this map is not intended as legal consultation or an indication of your rights. If you have experienced discrimination, contact Lambda Legal's Help Desk or otherwise seek legal advice.
State statute explicitly prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity (22 states , 1 territory + D.C.)
State explicitly interprets existing prohibition on sex discrimination
- Second Circuit rejected the appeal of an employee who was fired by a school district for refusing to participate in mandatory workplace workout about bias based on LGBTQ status, citing conflicts with his religious beliefs.
- The district court previously found in favor of the employer, noting that the plaintiff did not present any evidence of religious discrimination.
- Granting the plaintiff’s seek to forego the required anti-discrimination development would have caused the employer to violate training requirements for public schools in New York State. The employer was therefore not required to accommodate him, and lawfully terminated him for repeated refusal to attend the training.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has rejected an employee’s claim that he was unlawfully discriminated against based on religion after he refused to join mandatory LGBTQ anti-discrimination trainings. In Zdunski v. Erie 2-Chautauqua-Cattaraugus BOCES, No. 22-547 (2d Cir. Mar. 13, 2023), the plaintiff sued his former employer, a public organization that provides educational programs and services to school districts, after he was terminated from employment. The distri
Did the Supreme Court Speak Businesses Can Now Discriminate Against LGBT Customers—and Employees Too?
The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that businesses can now legally reject service to LGBT people in specific circumstances. Its decision in 303 Resourceful v. Elenis allowed a graphic designer to rely on her First Amendment right to free speech to refuse to produce wedding websites for queer couples. This opinion single-handedly upended non-discrimination laws in the marketplace, but its effect is even more far-reaching: as early as the same day as the ruling, it was used to argue for the right to terminate LGBT employees.
LGBT People Acquire Been Under Attack
It was only 20 years ago that consensual gay sex was decriminalized in the United States. Since then, marriage was opened to same-sex couples (2015), and non-discrimination protections in employment were applied to many LGBT people across the country (2020).
Oh, how things have changed. More than 400 anti-LGBT bills own been proposed in articulate legislatures in just the past year. Hearkening help to the most virulent homophobia of the 70s, LGBT people are now casually being referred to as “child groom Seventy people completed the online eligibility screener, and 24 completed an interview. Based on content shared within the interview, three participants were deemed ineligible and their data were not included in the analysis. The findings below are based on the remaining 21 interviews. The average age of participants was 34. Participants reported a range of sexual orientations: five identified as lesbian, nine as gay, two as bisexual, seven as queer, one as Two-Spirit, two as pansexual, and one as asexual (participants could elect more than one response option). Five participants identified as women, eight as men, seven as non-binary, and one as “FTM” (i.e., female-to-male, provided as a write-in response). Participants included cisgender, transgender, and genderfluid people who identified as lesbian, queer, or bisexual, or as another non-heterosexual identity (e.g., Two-Spirit, queer). Seven participants reported having lived experience as transgender, a history of gender transition, and/or identified as gender diverse. The majority of par Housing nondiscrimination laws protect LGBTQ people from being unfairly evicted, denied housing, or refused the ability to rent or buy housing on the basis of their sexual orientation or gender identity. This map shows state housing nondiscrimination laws that explicitly enumerate sexual orientation and/or gender self as protected classes, as well as states that explicitly interpret existing sex protections to include sexual orientation and/or gender individuality. Additionally, in states without state protections, municipalities may provide local-level nondiscrimination protections. See our maps watching local-level nondiscrimination ordinances here. State statute explicitly prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity (22 states , 1 territory + D.C.) State explicitly interprets existing prohibition on sex discrimination The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has rejected an employee’s claim that he was unlawfully discriminated against based on religion after he refused to join mandatory LGBTQ anti-discrimination trainings. In Zdunski v. Erie 2-Chautauqua-Cattaraugus BOCES, No. 22-547 (2d Cir. Mar. 13, 2023), the plaintiff sued his former employer, a public organization that provides educational programs and services to school districts, after he was terminated from employment. The distriSerious Legal Problems faced by Lesbian, Same-sex attracted, Bisexual, and Other Sexual-Minority People in Western Canada: A Qualitative Study
Findings
Nondiscrimination Laws
Other rights may exist or be recognized where you live; this map is not intended as legal consultation or an indication of your rights. If you have experienced discrimination, contact Lambda Legal's Help Desk or otherwise seek legal advice.